<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jobs. Trends. Insight. &#187; Unemployment rate forecast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/tag/unemployment-rate-forecast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight</link>
	<description>WANTED Analytics - Jobs. Trends. Insight.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UI Claims Rise by 11,000 as Employers Skip Normal January Hiring Spree; Next Week Critical</title>
		<link>http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/2010/01/15/ui-claims-rise-by-11000-as-employers-skip-normal-january-hiring-spree-next-week-critical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/2010/01/15/ui-claims-rise-by-11000-as-employers-skip-normal-january-hiring-spree-next-week-critical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Thibault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Insurance Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate forecast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/?p=5654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Unemployment Insurance Claims rose by 11,000 in this week's Department of Labor Report. Employers missed their usual January rendez-vous with job seekers &#8211; Hiring Demand fell by 7% or 15,000 new online job ads** last week on a seasonally adjusted basis. Employers can make it up next week, however. December and January employment data [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Unemployment Insurance Claims rose by 11,000 in this week's Department of Labor Report. Employers missed their usual January <em>rendez-vou</em>s with job seekers &#8211; Hiring Demand fell by 7% or 15,000 new online job ads** last week on a seasonally adjusted basis. Employers can make it up next week, however.</p>
<p>December and January employment data is highly volatile in terms of seasonal fluctuations. Job ads usually drop heavily during Christmas-time and then pop back up in January.</p>
<p>What's more, there's something we call "the January bounce" &#8211; not only does January Hiring Demand <em>come back</em> from the Holiday slump, it usually <em>jumps above</em><em> </em>previous December levels. New budgets are usually the source of this "January Bounce" &#8211; there's a sort of pent-up demand for labor that's waiting for a new budget cycle to kick in.</p>
<p>During the last week of December, UI Claims benefited from a smaller than expected seasonal dip in Hiring Demand (UI claims improved by 22,000). <strong>This week, however, UI Claims suffered from a smaller than expected January rebound in Hiring Demand.</strong></p>
<p>The two tables below show historical December/January seasonal fluctuations, compared to what we've seen so far this year.</p>
<p><span id="more-5654"></span>Whereas we expected Hiring Demand to drop around 28.2% at the end of December because of the Holidays, it in fact dropped only 19.7% &#8211; this is what drove new UI claims down by 22,000 new claims. We were expecting a 24.8% jump in Hiring Demand this week, yet we only saw a 21% jump &#8211; and UI claims rose 11,000. (We label the UI claims as "Improvements" in the table below : a negative sign in front of UI changes is actually a good thing, as there are <em>fewer</em> unemployed, so the sign has been flipped momentarily to facilitate interpretation&#8230;). It could be that the current economic climate "dampens" seasonal movements. The good news is that over the past couple weeks we've still seen a net improvement of 11,000 new UI Claims  (22,000 for last week minus 11,000 for this week's release). (The bounce in 2008 was a little bit more spread around. The difficulty in seasonally adjusting weekly data is were "how exactly" a holiday falls matters greatly. January 1st falling on a Friday has a different effect than if January 1st fell on a Wednesday, for example &#8211; that entire week may have to be discounted more heavily in terms of seasonal adjustments).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Table : December/January Hiring Demand Seasonal Movements</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_5658" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 569px"><a  rel="attachment wp-att-5658" href="http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/2010/01/15/ui-claims-rise-by-11000-as-employers-skip-normal-january-hiring-spree-next-week-critical/table-1/"><img class="size-full wp-image-5658" title="Table 1" src="http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/c/uploads/2010/01/Table-1.png" alt="" width="559" height="110" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Source: WANTED Analytics data</p></div>
<p>In 2006 and 2007, Hiring Demand rebounded by over 55% in the first two weeks of January. January 2008 was the start of the recession, so the bounce was less pronounced at 51.7%. For 2009, the financial crisis had just struck, and we saw a measly bounce of 35.2% . We'd need a jump of over 30% for the second week of January this year to compensate for last week's soft rebound. This is possible, but we're more likely to see something around 25%.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Table : January Hiring Demand Rebound, Historical</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_5659" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 528px"><a  rel="attachment wp-att-5659" href="http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/2010/01/15/ui-claims-rise-by-11000-as-employers-skip-normal-january-hiring-spree-next-week-critical/table-2-2/"><img class="size-full wp-image-5659" title="Table 2" src="http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/c/uploads/2010/01/Table-2.png" alt="" width="518" height="122" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Source: WANTED Analytics data</p></div>
<p>Below is a 4-year Hiring Demand time-series, where a small horizontal hash has been inserted to show the break between the first and second week of January. This coming week will be a clear signal of how businesses will hire in 2010, as new budgets are rolled out and hiring activity finds its way to online job boards.</p>
<div id="attachment_5660" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 692px"><a  rel="attachment wp-att-5660" href="http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/2010/01/15/ui-claims-rise-by-11000-as-employers-skip-normal-january-hiring-spree-next-week-critical/ts/"><img class="size-full wp-image-5660" title="TS" src="http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/c/uploads/2010/01/TS.png" alt="" width="682" height="192" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Source: WANTED Analytics</p></div>
<p>(**: WANTED Analytics is a highly flexible data querying tool. The sites which are used to construct Hiring Demand Indicators can change, depending on, for example, significant price changes for a job board. If a job board drops its price by 50%, the rise in online job ads isn't macroeconomic, rather it's a price-elasticity response to cheaper advertising. Such modifications were carried out for this week's analysis, and the time-series graph above is not directly comparable to those seen in previous posts).</p>
 <img src="http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/c/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=5654" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><p><small>&copy; Copyright 2010 <a href="http://www.wantedtech.com/">WANTED Technologies Corporation</a></small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wantedanalytics.com/insight/2010/01/15/ui-claims-rise-by-11000-as-employers-skip-normal-january-hiring-spree-next-week-critical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
